翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Nayzak Air Transport
・ Nayé, Senegal
・ Naz
・ Naz (disambiguation)
・ Naz (name)
・ NAZ (studio)
・ Naz Aydemir
・ Naz Ball
・ Naz Baloch
・ Naz Choudhury
・ Naz Dasht
・ Naz Edwards
・ Naz elama (dance)
・ Naz Elmas
・ Naz Foundation (India) Trust
Naz Foundation v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
・ Naz Ikramullah
・ Naz Khialvi
・ Naz Long
・ Naz Mehmet
・ Naz Nomad and the Nightmares
・ Naz Osmanoglu
・ Naz Shah
・ Naz Shahrokh
・ Naz, Iran
・ Naza
・ Naza (artist)
・ Naza Automotive Manufacturing
・ Naza Sutera
・ Nazacara


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Naz Foundation v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi : ウィキペディア英語版
Naz Foundation v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi

''Naz Foundation v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi''〔(''Naz Foundation v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi'', 160 Delhi Law Times 277 (Delhi High Court 2009) )〕 is a landmark Indian case decided by a two-judge bench of the Delhi High Court, which held that treating consensual homosexual sex between adults as a crime is a violation of fundamental rights protected by India's Constitution. The verdict resulted in the decriminalisation of homosexual acts involving consenting adults, in the jurisdiction of the Delhi High court. This was later challenged in the Supreme court of India.
==Facts==
Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, introduced during British rule of India, criminalizes "carnal intercourse against the order of nature". This phrase was interpreted to mean all forms of sexual activity other than heterosexual penile-vaginal intercourse.〔''Naz Foundation v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi'', (160 Delhi Law Times 277, p. 2 ) (Delhi High Court 2009)〕
The movement to repeal Section 377 was led by the Naz Foundation (India) Trust, a non-governmental organization, which filed a lawsuit in the Delhi High Court in 2001, seeking legalisation of homosexual intercourse between consenting adults.〔(【引用サイトリンク】title=Chronology: 8-year-long legal battle for gay rights )〕 This was the second such petition, the first filed in 1994 by AIDS Bhedbhav Virodhi Andolan. In 2003, the Delhi High Court refused to consider a petition regarding the legality of the law, saying that the petitioners had no ''locus standi'' in the matter. Naz Foundation appealed to the Supreme Court of India against the decision of the High Court to dismiss the petition on technical grounds. The Supreme Court decided that Naz Foundation had the standing to file a public interest lawsuit in this case, and sent the case back to the Delhi High Court to reconsider it on the merits.
In 2006, the National AIDS Control Organisation filed an affidavit stating that the enforcement of Section 377 violates LGBT rights. Subsequently, there was a significant intervention in the case by a Delhi-based coalition of LGBT, women's and human rights activists called "Voices Against 377", which supported the demand to "read down" section 377 to exclude adult consensual sex from within its purview.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Naz Foundation v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.